The Media “Event” and Erasure of Dialogue: On Image- and Decision-Making in U.S. Elections
George H. Jensen | University of Arkansas at Little Rock
ORCiD ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7680-5508
___________________________________________
DOI: https://doi.org/10.71106/ZUTS5544
Publication: Social Justice Special Issue
Abstract | As new media emerge, especially social networking, the individual’s process of making political decisions will change. Despite early claims that social networking might usher in more participatory forms of democracy, the opposite may be true. This article analyzes the decision-making process of thirteen young, undecided voters in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election to understand how they are using social media to reach decisions. These young voters value an appearance of authenticity in political candidates, but they seem to resolve the “information overload” of news coverage and campaign advertising by focusing on a single random event rather than engaging in dialogue with others or by looking for consistency across events. An analysis of these young voters’ processes will demonstrate what is absent from their decisions, which they seem to have made in isolation—made, that is, without showing awareness or consideration of broader political/historical/
Key words | Social Networking, Aristotle, Jean Baudrillard, Paradeigma, Rhetorical Example, Event, U.S. Presidential Elections, Hannah Arendt, Democratic Dialogue, Social Justice
George H. Jensen (ghjensen@ualr.edu; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-
MLA Citation for this Article:
Jensen, George H. “The Media “Event” and Erasure of Dialogue: On Image- and Decision-Making in U.S. Elections.” Language, Literature, and Interdisciplinary Studies, Social Justice Special Issue, 31 Dec. 2025, pp. 2.49–2.64, https://doi.org/10.71106/ZUTS5544.
